Small Plane Turbulence — Why It Feels Worse and What To Do

If you've ever flown on a regional jet or turboprop and noticed it's far bumpier than a 777, you're not imagining it. Small aircraft genuinely experience more turbulence — and it's basic physics.

Why small planes feel more turbulence: the physics

The key factor is inertia. A turbulence eddy creates a force — say, a 100 Newton upward push. Applied to a 250-tonne Boeing 777, this force produces barely perceptible acceleration. Applied to a 20-tonne Embraer ERJ-145, it produces 12.5 times the acceleration. The aircraft moves more for the same atmospheric disturbance. This is identical to why a large ship barely notices waves that toss a small boat. Additionally, small aircraft have shorter wingspans. A 747's 68-meter wingspan spans multiple turbulence eddies simultaneously, averaging out the forces. A regional jet's 26-meter wingspan fits inside a single eddy, responding fully to its entire displacement. The net result: regional jets and turboprops feel 2–5× bumpier than widebodies in the same atmospheric conditions.

Regional jets and turboprops in turbulence

The most common small commercial aircraft are the Embraer E-series (E170, E175, E190), Bombardier CRJ series (CRJ-200, CRJ-700, CRJ-900), ATR turboprops (ATR-42, ATR-72), and Dash 8 series. Of these, the CRJ-200 is the smallest (50 seats, 21.2m wingspan) and most turbulence-sensitive in regular service. Passengers on CRJ-200s frequently describe turbulence that would be light on a 737 as moderate-to-severe. ATR turboprops fly at lower altitudes (12,000–20,000 feet) than jets, which keeps them below the jet stream but exposed to convective turbulence and mechanical turbulence from terrain.

Which small plane routes are bumpiest

The bumpiest small plane routes combine small aircraft with high turbulence environments. US regional routes in the Rockies — Denver connections to Sun Valley (SUN), Aspen (ASE), Jackson Hole (JAC), Telluride (TEX) — put small aircraft through mountain wave turbulence at low altitude, producing very rough rides. Commuter routes through Appalachia in winter are similarly rough. In Europe, Beech 1900 and ATR services to Scottish islands, Norwegian fjord airports, and Alpine destinations are among the bumpiest regularly scheduled flights in the world. Alaskan bush routes in small aircraft (Cessna 208, Piper PA-31) operate in some of the most challenging turbulence environments in aviation.

How to survive a bumpy small plane flight

Seat selection matters more on small aircraft than large ones — sit as close to the wing as possible. On a CRJ-200 with 50 seats, wing rows are approximately 8–16. Window seats allow you to see the horizon, which helps with vestibular-visual mismatch (motion sickness). Take motion sickness medication (meclizine or dimenhydrinate) before boarding if you are susceptible — once symptoms start, medication is far less effective. Keep your seatbelt fastened throughout — small aircraft turbulence events can be sudden and violent. Avoid eating a large meal before a bumpy regional flight. If you can choose your aircraft, check the aircraft type in the booking — many routes offer both jet and turboprop service. The jet is almost always smoother.

Most Turbulent Routes

Ranked by historical turbulence score — click any route for details

Heavy
Heavy
Heavy
Heavy
Heavy
Heavy
Heavy
Heavy
Heavy
Heavy
Moderate
Moderate
Browse all routes →

Frequently Asked Questions

Are small planes less safe in turbulence?
Small planes feel worse but are not proportionally more dangerous in turbulence than large aircraft. All certified commercial aircraft must meet the same structural load factor requirements — 2.5g positive, 1.0g negative — regardless of size. A CRJ-200 and a 777 are both certified to the same margins. The difference is in comfort and passenger experience, not structural safety. The injury risk is actually higher on small aircraft in severe turbulence because the smaller cabin has less room to absorb impacts and turbulence forces feel more intense — so keeping your seatbelt on is even more important on small aircraft.
Do turboprops have more turbulence than jets?
Generally yes, for two reasons. First, turboprops fly at lower altitudes (12,000–20,000 feet) than jets (30,000–40,000 feet), keeping them in the layer of the atmosphere where convective and mechanical turbulence is strongest. Second, turboprops tend to be smaller aircraft with less inertia. Some turboprop routes also operate into airports serving challenging terrain — mountain airports, island airports — where turbulence environments are more demanding than standard flat-terrain routes.
What is the bumpiest commercial aircraft type?
Among common commercial aircraft in current service, the CRJ-200 (50-seat regional jet) is widely considered the bumpiest for its size and the routes it operates. Its small size, stiff wing, and T-tail configuration make it particularly sensitive to turbulence. The ATR-42 turboprop rivals it in bumpiness on routes with significant weather. Among widebodies, the Boeing 767 is noticeably bumpier than the 787 Dreamliner (which uses composite materials and a larger wingspan for better ride quality). The A380 and 747 are among the smoothest widebodies due to their enormous mass and wingspan.
Can a small plane get turbulence at the same level as a 777?
The atmospheric turbulence at a given location is the same regardless of aircraft size — a given patch of air has the same amount of kinetic energy whether a CRJ or a 777 flies through it. But the forces transmitted to passengers are very different. A turbulence event that produces 0.3g on a 777 (barely noticeable) might produce 0.8–1.2g on a CRJ-200 (dramatic and potentially injurious to unbelted passengers). So while the atmospheric turbulence is identical, the experienced turbulence scales inversely with aircraft size and weight.
Real-time turbulence in your pocket
Live PIREPs, SIGMETs, AI forecast & best seat guide — free on iOS
Download Free on iOS